اَلَمْ
یَاْتِكُمْ
نَبَؤُا
الَّذِیْنَ
مِنْ
قَبْلِكُمْ
قَوْمِ
نُوْحٍ
وَّعَادٍ
وَّثَمُوْدَ ۛؕ۬
وَالَّذِیْنَ
مِنْ
بَعْدِهِمْ ۛؕ
لَا
یَعْلَمُهُمْ
اِلَّا
اللّٰهُ ؕ
جَآءَتْهُمْ
رُسُلُهُمْ
بِالْبَیِّنٰتِ
فَرَدُّوْۤا
اَیْدِیَهُمْ
فِیْۤ
اَفْوَاهِهِمْ
وَقَالُوْۤا
اِنَّا
كَفَرْنَا
بِمَاۤ
اُرْسِلْتُمْ
بِهٖ
وَاِنَّا
لَفِیْ
شَكٍّ
مِّمَّا
تَدْعُوْنَنَاۤ
اِلَیْهِ
مُرِیْبٍ
۟
3

All of the prophets who came to various communities, had the same experience: everywhere efforts were made to silence them, for every community opposed its prophet. What was the reason for this? The reason for this was the people’s ‘doubt’. This doubt existed because the religion of their forefathers held sway and was widely believed in. By contrast, here was the divine religion being introduced by an apparently ordinary man. The arguments appeared to favour the religion of the Prophet. But historical glory and public popularity seemed to be on the side of their forefathers’ religion. The addressees of the Prophet were themselves in a dilemma: they did not have the power to reject the arguments and at the same time they could not understand how they could consider their leaders and great men to be on the wrong path. This double-edged puzzle pushed them further into a dilemma. Attached as they were to their ancestral religion, they could not accept the truth inspite of being convinced of the strong arguments.